Symbols Part 3
Here's another alternative, which would unify lambda expressions and "symbols" nicely.
Also note that the solution in my previous post would be good for "mock" stype unit testings, since it works just fine in .NET 2.0 an later. It would allow you to specify method call expectations by writing the methods names directly into your code (rather than using string representations of their names).
Also note that the solution in my previous post would be good for "mock" stype unit testings, since it works just fine in .NET 2.0 an later. It would allow you to specify method call expectations by writing the methods names directly into your code (rather than using string representations of their names).
0 Comments:
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home